Social Cash Transfers in Low-Income African Countries: Conditional or Unconditional?

By B. Schubert, R. Slater. 2006

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dff75c16c7f1c3df8ef6b8239fb8d40c694c100a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. R. Slater
2. Margaret E. Grosh
3. C. Ninno
4. L. Peskett
5. E. Tesliuc
6. Jessica Brown
7. A. Ouerghi

In Gender Studies

1. R. Slater
2. Margaret E. Grosh
3. C. Ninno
4. E. Tesliuc
5. A. Ouerghi
6. A. Prakash
7. edited by
8. A. Barrientos

In Safety Research

1. R. Slater
2. Margaret E. Grosh
3. C. Ninno
4. E. Tesliuc
5. A. Ouerghi
6. A. Prakash
7. edited by
8. A. Barrientos

Citations in the corpus

• For Protection and Promotion: The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets (2008, background): “The use of conditions and the impact of the enforcement of conditions in contrast to the impact of simple cash transfers alone is subject to debate (de Janvry and Sadoulet 2006; Samson 2006; Schubert and Slater 2006) (box 7.15).”
• Making REDD work for the poor : a poverty environment partnership (PEP) report (2008, result): “Evidence from studies on conditional cash transfer schemes in other sectors indicates that this is a real concern (Schubert and Slater, 2006).”
• Cash transfers, social protection and poverty reduction (2011, background): “Freeland, for example, describes conditional cash transfers as pernicious, abominable, atrocious and superfluous (2007) whilst Schubert and Slater (2006) raise four key concerns:”
• Africa human development report 2012: towards a food secure future (2012, unknown): “61 Schubert and Slater 2006.”