Phosphorus management in low input stockless cropping systems : Crop and soil responses to contrasting P regimes in a 36-year experiment in southern France

By B. Colomb, Philippe P. Debaeke, C. Jouany, J. Nolot. 2007

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A comparison of soil tests for available phosphorus in long‐term field experiments in Europe (2017, unknown): “…6 81 14 0 1.8 Pellerin et al., 2000 Pierroton 270 547 4.7 Sand 5 93 2 0 2.2 Denoroy et al., 2013; personal communication Toulouse 1374 656 6.9 Loamy clay–clay 27 35 38 – 0.9 Colomb et al., 2007 Peldon 3517 659 6.6 Silty clay loam 31 10 59 – 3.9 Knight et al., 2014; personal communication Great…”
Determining critical values of soil Olsen-P for maize and winter wheat from long-term experiments in China (2009, methodology): “Critical values generally differ among crops because of different P requirements (Colomb et al. 2007) and among sites because of differences in soil properties (Johnston and Poulton 1997a, b).”
An overview of fertilizer‐P recommendations in Europe: soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations (2012, background): “Publications dealing with this subject (Barraclough et al., 1997; Johnston et al., 1998; Németh, 2006; Colomb et al., 2007) are, in fact, not published as part of the official calibration procedures.”
Phosphorus availability and microbial community in the rhizosphere of intercropped cereal and legume along a P-fertilizer gradient (2016, background): “The soil is classified as a Luvisol (FAOUNESCO, 1989), with 258 g kg−1 clay, 168 g kg−1 fine silt, 167 g kg−1 coarse silt, 198 g kg−1 fine sand and 164 g kg−1 coarse sand (Colomb et al. 2007).”