On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries
By L. Schipper, Michael Grubb. 2000
295 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Energy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfbcb2b207004095d45feb51804e06fc0d8b80de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Energy
- T. Barker
- M. Mueller
- Jaume Freire-González
- K. Gram-hanssen
- Inês Lima Azevedo
- J. Bergh
- J. Rubin
- P. Haan
Citations in the corpus
- Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective (2005, background): “To investigate macro-rebound effects, Schipper and Grubb (2000) review decomposition analysis for energy demand in seven industrialized economies.”
- Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects (2014, background): “Schipper & Grubb (30) reached that same conclusion using a top-down approach: They analyzed historical data on energy use and prices in different sectors of the economy and showed that “key measures of activity (car use, manufacturing output and structure, housing floor space, etc.”
- Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect (2007, unknown): “It is difficult to determine empirically these indirect effects, but it is argued they are small, since only 5 to15% of income saved is respent on indirect energy use—with air travel at the high end (Schipper and Grubb, 2000).”
- Does the hybrid Toyota Prius lead to rebound effects? Analysis of size and number of cars previously owned by Swiss Prius buyers (2006, background): “The macro-level rebound effect can hardly be separated from other technological trends and long-term changes in the ratio of GDP to energy-efficiency (Birol and Keppler, 2000; Schipper and Grubb, 2000; Schipper et al., 2001).”
- Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? (2020, background): “Some researchers do not deny the rebound effect in principle but estimate that its practical significance is relatively low (e.g., Gillingham et al., 2009; Goldstein et al., 2011; Nadel, 2012; Schipper and Grubb, 2000).”
- Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input–output analysis Part 1: Theoretical framework (2013, background): “The indirect rebound effect is related to the re-spending of energy cost savings on other goods, O , with prices P o , and the energy or emissions associated with this induced consumption (Berkhout et al., 2000; Schipper and Grubb, 2000; Sorrell and Dimitropoulos, 2008).”