Explaining Classifications For Individual Instances
By Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko. 2008
293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- K. Müller
- Wojciech Samek
- Longo Luca
- Giulia Vilone
- Przemyslaw Biecek
- Grgoire Montavon
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- K. Müller
- Wojciech Samek
- Luc Van Gool
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Jitendra Malik
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- K. Müller
- Longo Luca
- Wojciech Samek
- Giulia Vilone
- Przemyslaw Biecek
- Grgoire Montavon
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “Možina, Demšar, Bratko, and Zupan, 2005; Robnik-Šikonja and Kononenko, 2008; Robnik-Šikonja, Likas, Constantinopoulos, Kononenko, and Štrumbelj, 2011).”
- Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2018, methodology): “[93]–[95]).”
- Explanations of model predictions with live and breakDown packages (2018, background): “It is worth noting that similar decomposition of predictions and measures of contribution for classifiers have been studied in Robnik-Šikonja and Kononenko (2008). The greedy search can start from null set of indexes (then in each step a single feature is being relaxed) or it can start from full set”
- Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challenges (2018, background): “Attribution, a term introduced by [2], also referred to as relevance [5, 7, 60, 47], contribution [51], class saliency [52] or influence [27, 1, 28], aims to reveal components of high importance in the input to the DNN and their effect as the input is propagated through the network.”
- Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “looked at selecting which features in the model were important for a decision, mostly built on local explanations [157, 6, 156] or on information gain [90, 89].”
- Enhancing Transparency and Control When Drawing Data-Driven Inferences About Individuals (2016, background): “phenomenon that we want to provide transparency into.(22) Explaining instance-level classifications by assessing the (causal) influence of data inputs is”
- How to Explain Individual Classification Decisions (2009, methodology): “To save the time of combinatorial training Robnik-ˇSikonja and Kononenko (2008) propose to use neutral values which have to be estimated by a known prior distribution of all possible parameter values.”
- Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysis (2017, methodology): “The work presented in this paper is based on an instance-specific method by Robnik-Šikonja & Kononenko (2008), the prediction difference analysis , which is reviewed in the next section.”
- Detecting concept drift in data streams using model explanation (2018, methodology): “E P T Several related explanation methods that study the influence of each individual attribute on its own with limitations in considering their potentially intertwined relations exist in the related work (Robnik-ˇSikonja & Kononenko, 2008; Lemaire et al., 2008; Lughofer et al., 2016a).”
- Regional Multi-Scale Approach for Visually Pleasing Explanations of Deep Neural Networks (2018, methodology): “Robnik-Sikonja and Kononenko proposed the prediction differencemethod [16], and several studies have extended and improved this method [15], [17].”
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis (2021, methodology): “(2017) adapted prediction difference analysis (Robnik-Šikonja and Kononenko (2008)) for generating saliency maps. If each pixel in an image is considered a feature, prediction difference analysis assigns a relevance value to each pixel, by measuring how the prediction changes if the pixel is conside”
- Explaining Data-Driven Document Classifications (2014, methodology): “Specifically, a procedure for producing explanations of document classifications may provide no explanation at all.”
- Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions (2014, background): “Previous general approaches [19,24] tackled the problem in the following way:”
- A New Method to Visualize Deep Neural Networks (2016, methodology): “We want to build upon the method of Robnik-ˇSikonja and Kononenko (2008) to develop a tool for analyzing how DC-NNs classify images.”
- Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanation (2020, methodology): “, 2017), which is based on a precursor method to IME (Robnik-Šikonja and Kononenko, 2008; Štrumbelj et al., 2009), removes individual features (or groups of features) and analyzes the difference in the model’s prediction.”
- Efficiently Explaining Decisions of Probabilistic RBF Classification Networks (2011, methodology): “We first present the simpler of the two [6] (called EXPLAIN in the reminder of the text), which computes the influence of the feature value by changing this value and observing its impact on the model’s output.”
- Uncertainty Estimation in Bayesian Neural Networks And Links to Interpretability (2018, methodology): “[69] is multivariate analysis, rather than univariate analysis in [53].”
- Justification Narratives for Individual Classifications (2014, background): “…the model in a human-consumable form (Szafron et al., 2003) or as the problem of projecting the processes and parameters of non-linear models to make them more meaningful to the expert (Robnik-Sikonja and Kononenko, 2008; Baehrens et al., 2010), while justification as a goal has not been mentioned.”