Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanation
By Ian Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In Lee. Journal of machine learning research, 2020
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Researchers have proposed a wide variety of model explanation approaches, but it remains unclear how most methods are related or when one method is preferable to another. We establish a new class of methods, removal-based explanations, that are based on the principle of simulating feature removal to quantify each feature's influence. These methods vary in several respects, so we develop a framework that characterizes each method along three dimensions: 1) how the method removes features, 2) what model behavior the method explains, and 3) how the method summarizes each feature's influence. Our framework unifies 25 existing methods, including several of the most widely used approaches (SHAP, LIME, Meaningful Perturbations, permutation tests). This new class of explanation methods has rich connections that we examine using tools that have been largely overlooked by the explainability literature. To anchor removal-based explanations in cognitive psychology, we show that feature removal is a simple application of subtractive counterfactual reasoning. Ideas from cooperative game theory shed light on the relationships and trade-offs among different methods, and we derive conditions under which all removal-based explanations have information-theoretic interpretations. Through this analysis, we develop a unified framework that helps practitioners better understand model explanation tools, and that offers a strong theoretical foundation upon which future explainability research can build.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3871d9f7039a118a14a3a115d52f3326efa6992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Gherman Novakovsky
- Nils Strodthoff
- Wyeth W. Wasserman
- Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz
- Maxwell W. Libbrecht
- Nick C. Dexter
- S. Mostafavi
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Obtaining genetics insights from deep learning via explainable artificial intelligence (2022, methodology): “Intuitively, almost all post-hoc model interpretation methods can be understood through a feature removal recipe, whereby trained models are probed to assess the importance of a given feature or feature combination to the model’s performance 22 .”
- Diffusion-based Time Series Imputation and Forecasting with Structured State Space Models (2022, background): “We also stress that the most realistic scenario to address imputation as an underspecified problem class is the use of probabilistic imputation methods, which do not provide only a single imputation but instead allow samples of different plausible imputations, thus allowing for investigation of the ”