Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanation

By Ian Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, Su-In Lee. Journal of machine learning research, 2020

364 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Researchers have proposed a wide variety of model explanation approaches, but it remains unclear how most methods are related or when one method is preferable to another. We establish a new class of methods, removal-based explanations, that are based on the principle of simulating feature removal to quantify each feature's influence. These methods vary in several respects, so we develop a framework that characterizes each method along three dimensions: 1) how the method removes features, 2) what model behavior the method explains, and 3) how the method summarizes each feature's influence. Our framework unifies 25 existing methods, including several of the most widely used approaches (SHAP, LIME, Meaningful Perturbations, permutation tests). This new class of explanation methods has rich connections that we examine using tools that have been largely overlooked by the explainability literature. To anchor removal-based explanations in cognitive psychology, we show that feature removal is a simple application of subtractive counterfactual reasoning. Ideas from cooperative game theory shed light on the relationships and trade-offs among different methods, and we derive conditions under which all removal-based explanations have information-theoretic interpretations. Through this analysis, we develop a unified framework that helps practitioners better understand model explanation tools, and that offers a strong theoretical foundation upon which future explainability research can build.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3871d9f7039a118a14a3a115d52f3326efa6992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Gherman Novakovsky
  2. Nils Strodthoff
  3. Wyeth W. Wasserman
  4. Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz
  5. Maxwell W. Libbrecht
  6. Nick C. Dexter
  7. S. Mostafavi

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Nils Strodthoff
  2. Wyeth W. Wasserman
  3. Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz

Citations in the corpus