Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation
By N. Blaikie. 2000
1,477 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df5ff7901a07b470b1ef70d5f97406dd70209959
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- W. Stubbs
- C. Cocklin
- Glenn A. Bowen
- Ian Harwood
- Heather Stewart
- Rod Gapp
- Mateusz Lewandowski
- Daisy Yan
Citations in the corpus
- Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting (2015, unknown): “Qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or to interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings that ‘insiders’ bring to them (Blaikie 2000).”
- Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia (2017, methodology): “Qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting tomake sense of, or to interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings that ‘insiders’ bring to them (Blaikie, 2000).”
- Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note (2008, background): “As Blaikie (2000) argues, research that is concerned with theory generation may require sensitizing concepts, which serve as a point of reference and a guide for theory development.”
- Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model” (2008, methodology): “Abduction (Blaikie, 2000) and case studies (Eisenhardt, 1989) are both useful for theory building when little is known about the phenomenon under investigation.”
- Research Methodology (2007, unknown): “Blaikie (2000)discusses the retroductive approach as beginning with an observed phenomenon and using research identify a real supporting structure for the phenomenon.”
- Exploring the alchemy of qualitative management research: Seeking trustworthiness, credibility and rigor through crystallization (2017, background): “Another option (not shown in Figure 1) is the retroductive approach that is “relatively undeveloped in the social sciences” and associated with mixed methods (Blaikie, 2000, p. 276).”