Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden

By J. Lemel, Johan Truvé, Bo Söderberg. Wildlife Biology, 2003

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach (2014, background): “1982, Rosvold & Andersen 2008) and may restrict local movements (Lemel et al. 2003).”
How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? (2008, background): “2003); the start of activity is closely correlated to sunset (Gerard and Campan 1988; Cousse et al. 1995; Lemel et al. 2003).”
Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications (2010, background): “Few studies have detected a marked seasonal variation due to environmental factors (Singer et al. 1981; Gabor et al. 1999; Lemel et al. 2003; Keuling et al. 2008a), but they do refer to study areas with harsh climatic conditions in which the weather can affect the availability of forage.”
Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L. (2008, background): “In Sweden, daily home range sizes fluctuated seasonally (Lemel et al. 2003), depending on the length of the night and on weather conditions, whereas no seasonal changes seemed to occur in Italy (Russo et al. 1997).”