Is My Home My Castle? Place Attachment, Risk Perception, and Religious Faith

By Miriam Billig. 2006

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df4eb423657cd356c5763da2b46b7a2ea81a144e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. R. Gifford
2. N. Piccoli
3. Yaniv Belhassen
4. D. Stylidis
5. L. Scannell
6. C. Rollero
7. Samuel S. Kim
8. Amir Shani

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Stylidis
2. R. Gifford
3. L. Scannell
4. K. Woosnam
5. Milan Ivkov
6. N. Piccoli
7. C. Rollero
8. Yaniv Belhassen

Citations in the corpus

• Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists (2017, result): “Studies in environmental psychology, for example, have empirically confirmed that higher levels of affection lead to more positive cognitive evaluations of a place's attributes (e.g., Billig, 2006; Rollero & Piccoli, 2010).”
• Destination loyalty explained through place attachment, destination familiarity and destination image (2020, background): “In relation to prior or repeat visitors, which is the case here, researchers have found that higher levels of place attachment also lead to more positive evaluations of the physical qualities of the place (e.g., Billig, 2006; Bonaiuto, Breakwell, & Cano, 1996; Rollero & De Piccoli, 2010).”
• Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study (2010, background): “Persons highly place attached, in fact, can perceive it as less polluted then people less affectively linked (Bonaiuto et al., 1996) or less risky, as Billig (2006) showed in the Gaza region, where Jews more place attached were less likely to believe that living in Gaza was dangerous.”
• Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? (2011, unknown): “…of order suggested by Alexander (Alexander et al., 1977; Alexander, 2002) and developed in the form of mathematical principles by Salingaros (1999, 2006), in works of humanistic architects engaged in environment-behavior studies (Jacobs, 1999; Rapoport, 1990), and in the works of the New Urban…”
• Explaining conative destination image through cognitive and affective destination image and emotional solidarity with residents (2020, background): “, Billig, 2006; Rollero & Piccoli, 2010). Most researchers though counter-argue that peoples’ affective evaluation of a destination largely depends on their knowledge of that destination (Baloglu & McCleary, 1999; Boo & Busser, 2005; Russel & Pratt, 1980). A number of studies in particular have esta”
• Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction (2017, background): “…be supported by place attachment and identity such as when important places symbolically connect individuals to their ancestors or cultures (e.g., Billig, 2006; Hay, 1998; Low, 1992; Mazumdar & Mazumdar, 2004), reinforce social ties and belonging to the community (Fried, 1963; Hidalgo &…”
• Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework (2010, background): “Attached individuals experience a heightened sense of safety, even when their place is situated in a war zone (e.g., Billig, 2006).”