Losses , Gains , and Hyperbolic Discounting : An Experimental Approach to Information Security Attitudes and Behavior

By Alessandro Acquisti. 2003

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df24576dc63413c602f7ae745cb496b21e5c6797

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “One of the most prominent models of discounting is hyperbolic discounting (Acquisti and Grossklags, 2003).”
The Economics of Privacy (2016, background): “The authors also find that, besides the FTC’s core principles of fair information practices, two factors influence consumers’ privacy online: “the relationships between entities and online users and the exchange of information for appropriate compensation.””
Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification (2004, background): “Traditional economics postulates that people are forward-looking and bayesian updaters: they take into account how current behavior will inﬂuence their future well-being and preferences.”
What Can Behavioral Economics Teach Us about Privacy (2008, background): “Combing the recent wave of theoretical models (like [44], [45], or [46]), surveys (like [47], [48], or [1]), and experiments (in the lab [4], [28], or [29]; and in the field [39]) with behavioral economics and newer approaches (such as neuroeconomics [49]) may help us cast light on the intricacies a”
Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online (2010, background): “The failure of various privacy enhancing technologies in the marketplace also suggests a disjunction between people’s stated attitudes and their actual actions to protect their privacy (Acquisti & Grossklags, 2003).”