Individual foraging behaviors and population distributions of a planktonic predator aggregating to phytoplankton thin layers

By Susanne Menden Deuer, Daniel Grünbaum. 2006

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df1928def769446d0fbe1a2ff0c14f933d1f4bd5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Feeding in the dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: linking behaviour with mechanisms (2011, background): “Furthermore, prey exudates and specific infochemicals (including certain amino acids and DMSP) can act as chemical cues (Martel, 2006; Menden-Deuer and Grünbaum, 2006; Breckels et al., this issue).”
Bridging the gap between marine biogeochemical and fisheries sciences; configuring the zooplankton link (2014, background): “…in ciliates (Jakobsen et al., 2006), prey detection is most likely associated with a combination of chemical cues, such as organics leaking from potential prey items, coupled with antibody–antigen type of surface recognition upon physical contact (Martel, 2006; Menden-Deuer and Grünbaum, 2006).”
Selective feeding behaviour of key free-living protists: avenues for continued study (2008, background): “…(Jennings 1906), and protists are commonly observed to exploit patches of high prey density in situ (Taylor & Berger 1980, Fenchel & Jonsson 1988, Menden-Deuer & Grunbaum 2006, Paffenhöfer et al. 2007), understanding the role of chemical-mediated prey location in prey selection, involving…”
Motility of zooplankton: fitness, foraging and predation (2007, background): “…copepods (Buskey, 1984; Tiselius, 1992; Takahashi and Tiselius, 2005) and protists (Buskey and Stoecker, 1988; Fenchel and Jonsson, 1988; Bartumeus et al., 2003; Menden-Deuer and Grünbaum, 2006)] and predation risk [e.g. protists (Broglio et al., 2001) and copepods (van Duren and Videler, 1996b)].”
Foraging behavior can influence dispersal of marine organisms (2007, background): “For phytoplankton and microzooplankton, Fr is typically ,,1, indicating that prey patches are not available to these organisms through foraging and that mortality and growth are likely important factors in observed distributions (Menden-Deuer and Grünbaum 2006).”
Biophysical interactions in the plankton: A cross‐scale review (2012, background): “Since in situ grazing rates have been shown to be higher within plankton layers (Menden-Deuer and Fredrickson 2010), ignoring this small-scale plankton patchiness may result in significantly underestimating global grazing rates.”