Feeding in the dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: linking behaviour with mechanisms

By E. Roberts, E. Wootton, Keith Davidson, H. Jeong, C. Lowe, D. J. Montagnes. 2011

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/605d03584320c2f10fb976a1540c2462890be170

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Kevin J. Flynn
2. A. Calbet
3. Aditee Mitra
4. E. Møller
5. T. Nielsen
6. S. Jónasdóttir
7. A. Bode
8. E. Saiz

In Molecular Biology

1. E. Møller
2. Kevin J. Flynn
3. T. Nielsen
4. S. Jónasdóttir
5. A. Calbet

In Oceanography

1. Aditee Mitra
2. A. Calbet
3. Kevin J. Flynn
4. E. Møller
5. T. Nielsen
6. W. Gentleman
7. S. Jónasdóttir
8. A. Bode

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis (2015, unknown): “In this study, the predators were the dinoflagellateOxyrrhis marina, a very small animal, about 40 lm long and 15 lm wide (Breckels et al. 2011; Roberts et al. 2011), and its prey were the even smaller algae Rhodomonas sp, which are roughly spherical in shape with a diameter of about 8 lm. Assuming…”
• Bridging the gap between marine biogeochemical and fisheries sciences; configuring the zooplankton link (2014, background): “It has been suggested that if a prey item turns out to be unpalatable, the protist predators can retain information about the physiological condition of the prey type for a short period and therefore avoid ingesting it (Flynn and Davidson, 1993; Roberts et al., 2011).”