The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language

By Marc Brysbaert, Marielle Lange, Ilse Van Wijnendaele. 2000

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/df010fa6d36fcc0911612f47fc44a83eb6abc945

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. (2012, background): “We think it is unfair of Chater and Oaksford (1999) to characterize non-Bayesian theories as “an assortment of apparently arbitrary mechanisms, subject to equally capricious limitations, with no apparent rationale or purpose” (p.”
The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? (2004, methodology): “…Takashima, & Yamazaki, 1998; Yamazaki, Ellis, Morrison, & Lambon Ralph, 1997); (2) visual lexical decision (Bonin, Chalard, M eot, & Fayol, 2001a; Brysbaert et al., 2000a; Brysbaert, Van Wijnendaele, & De Deyne, 2000b; Gerhand & Barry, 1999b; Morrison & Ellis, 1995, 2000; Turner, Valentine, &…”
Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. (2005, result): “Recently, Chalard et al. (2003) confirmed these results of Bonin et al.”
Visual Word Recognition (2007, unknown): “However, more recent research has suggested that the age at which we acquire a word may also be an important determinant of our experience with words (e.g. Brysbaert et al., 2000; Morrison and Ellis, 1995; Gerhand and Barry, 1999).”
Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages (2002, background): “What the present results to not support is the proposal that age of acquisition effects reside in semantic representations (Brysbaert et al., 2000), because that theory would predict that second-language vocabulary would inherit the age of acquisition characteristics of the corresponding first…”