Decentralization and Participation: The Governance of Common Pool Resources in Nepal’s Terai

By Arun Agrawal, K. Gupta. 2005

488 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dedfb3fecec044842c31a3db918b0ff90fd65b7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Ribot
2. L. Tacconi
3. Elinor Ostrom
4. Ravi Kanbur
5. T. Sikor
6. Sven Wunder
7. Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza
8. Neil Chueh-An Lee

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Ribot
2. A. Chhatre
3. T. Sikor
4. Elinor Ostrom
5. L. Tacconi
6. Tan Nguyen
7. Cécile Barnaud
8. A. Paassen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. L. Tacconi
2. Basudeb Guha-Khasnobis
3. Tan Nguyen
4. Elinor Ostrom
5. Ravi Kanbur
6. Cécile Barnaud
7. J. Ribot
8. T. Sikor

Citations in the corpus

• Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management (2013, background): “Key Words: critical systems; inequity; participatory approach; power; reflexivity; transdisciplinarity”
• Why May Forest Devolution not Benefit the Rural Poor? Forest Entitlements in Vietnam's Central Highlands (2007, background): “Similarly, differences in people’s forest endowments within a locality may originate from state regulations and programs (e.g., Dachang & Edmunds, 2003), local power structures (e.g., Agrawal & Gupta, 2005), and gender relations (e.g., Agarwal, 2001).”
• Introduction: Institutional Choice and Recognition in the Formation and Consolidation of Local Democracy (2008, background): “, while elected local governments often marginalise the poor, women, indigenous peoples and lower castes (Crook & Manor 1998; Crook & Sverrisson 2001; Agrawal & Gupta 2005).”
• Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: Theory and narrative (2007, methodology): “First, we should note that the concept of decentralization has been interchangeably used in the literature to refer to the transfer of control over resources from the state to local communities (e.g. Ribot, 2002b; Agrawal and Gupta, 2005), and from the central government to local governments (e.”
• Beyond Formality and Informality (2006, background): “Policies introduced to ‘formalize’ these arrangements have been criticized in light of their sometimes counterproductive consequences (Platteau 2004; Platteau and Gaspart 2003; Agrawal and Gupta 2005).”