Why May Forest Devolution not Benefit the Rural Poor? Forest Entitlements in Vietnam's Central Highlands

By T. Sikor, Tan Nguyen. 2007

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4e639c868dbd342170bbb2a95ca2d8ad463f754b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Articulating the “How,” the “For What,” the “For Whom,” and the “With Whom” in Concert: A Call to Broaden the Benchmarks of our Scholarship (2018, background): “…fields are demonstrating that not all forms of with whom are transformative; for example, token participation in leadership will not suffice (e.g., Rhode & Packel, 2014), nor will processes that do not deliberately address power differentials (Munoz, Paredes, & Thorp, 2007; Sikor & Nguyen, 2007).”
Special Issue: Access and property: a question of power and authority. (2009, background): “Forest Entitlements in Vietnam’s Central Highlands’, World Development 35(11): 2010–25.”
Strengthening conceptual foundations: Analysing frameworks for ecosystem services and poverty alleviation research (2013, background): “Sikor and Nguyen (2007) provide a forest-related illustration: through greater entitlements, wealthier households have more extensive means to exploit forests and derive higher benefits from forest resources, both through markets and in agricultural production.”
Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management (2013, background): “Key Words: critical systems; inequity; participatory approach; power; reflexivity; transdisciplinarity”
New Rights for Forest-Based Communities? Understanding Processes of Forest Tenure Reform (2010, background): “Given these previous rights, it should not be assumed that formalizing them will necessarily benefit communities (Cousins 2007, Meinzen Dick and Mwangi 2008, Sikor and Nguyen 2007).”