A Loss of Power in Institutional Theory

By Kamal Munir. 2015

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dedc3f223550fbd73f85f99a9290a96b32206c90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. S. Maguire
2. S. Gallhofer
3. J. Haslam
4. Cynthia Hardy

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. S. Maguire
2. Cynthia Hardy
3. S. Gallhofer
4. J. Haslam
5. Paul Tracey
6. Michael Lounsbury

In Public Administration

1. S. Maguire
2. S. Gallhofer
3. J. Haslam
4. Cynthia Hardy

Citations in the corpus

• Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: Shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism (2017, background): “52 For Willmott (2015), institutional theory – and similar argumentation may apply to the other ‘non-explicit’ framings referred to – is not substantively ‘critical’, e.g. in putting the ‘cart of meaning’ before the ‘horse of power’ (see also Cooper et al., 2008; Munir, 2014).”
• Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields (2017, background): “In doing so, much of the research on institutional entrepreneurship ignores the power relations that pervade institutional fields (Munir, 2015; Willmott 2015); and fails to reflect critically on the outcomes of institutional entrepreneurship, with resulting changes to the field assumed to be an impr”