Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data

By Jan Ruijter, C. Ramakers, W. Hoogaars, Y. Karlen, O. Bakker, Maurice J. B. van den Hoff, A. Moorman. Nucleic Acids Research, 2009

3,056 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite the central role of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the quantification of mRNA transcripts, most analyses of qPCR data are still delegated to the software that comes with the qPCR apparatus. This is especially true for the handling of the fluorescence baseline. This article shows that baseline estimation errors are directly reflected in the observed PCR efficiency values and are thus propagated exponentially in the estimated starting concentrations as well as ‘fold-difference’ results. Because of the unknown origin and kinetics of the baseline fluorescence, the fluorescence values monitored in the initial cycles of the PCR reaction cannot be used to estimate a useful baseline value. An algorithm that estimates the baseline by reconstructing the log-linear phase downward from the early plateau phase of the PCR reaction was developed and shown to lead to very reproducible PCR efficiency values. PCR efficiency values were determined per sample by fitting a regression line to a subset of data points in the log-linear phase. The variability, as well as the bias, in qPCR results was significantly reduced when the mean of these PCR efficiencies per amplicon was used in the calculation of an estimate of the starting concentration per sample.

Subfields: Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de9e7c7135b10592f434743d3f77f26239c80e59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Xin Lin
  2. Xuelin Huang
  3. P. Kralik
  4. Xiayu Rao
  5. Zhicheng Zhou
  6. J. Truu
  7. Matteo Ricchi

Citations in the corpus