Environments that Induce Synthetic Microbial Ecosystems

By Niels Klitgord, Daniel Segrè. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2010

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Interactions between microbial species are sometimes mediated by the exchange of small molecules, secreted by one species and metabolized by another. Both one-way (commensal) and two-way (mutualistic) interactions may contribute to complex networks of interdependencies. Understanding these interactions constitutes an open challenge in microbial ecology, with applications ranging from the human microbiome to environmental sustainability. In parallel to natural communities, it is possible to explore interactions in artificial microbial ecosystems, e.g. pairs of genetically engineered mutualistic strains. Here we computationally generate artificial microbial ecosystems without re-engineering the microbes themselves, but rather by predicting their growth on appropriately designed media. We use genome-scale stoichiometric models of metabolism to identify media that can sustain growth for a pair of species, but fail to do so for one or both individual species, thereby inducing putative symbiotic interactions. We first tested our approach on two previously studied mutualistic pairs, and on a pair of highly curated model organisms, showing that our algorithms successfully recapitulate known interactions, robustly predict new ones, and provide novel insight on exchanged molecules. We then applied our method to all possible pairs of seven microbial species, and found that it is always possible to identify putative media that induce commensalism or mutualism. Our analysis also suggests that symbiotic interactions may arise more readily through environmental fluctuations than genetic modifications. We envision that our approach will help generate microbe-microbe interaction maps useful for understanding microbial consortia dynamics and evolution, and for exploring the full potential of natural metabolic pathways for metabolic engineering applications.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de9cc45480fb379b250184ba718e9507fed8ca5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Bernhard O. Palsson
  2. Nathan E. Lewis
  3. Costas D. Maranas
  4. Adam M. Feist
  5. Harish Nagarajan
  6. Daniel Machado
  7. Kiran Raosaheb Patil
  8. D. McCloskey

In Molecular Biology

  1. Bernhard O. Palsson
  2. Adam M. Feist
  3. Nathan E. Lewis
  4. Daniel Machado
  5. Costas D. Maranas
  6. Harish Nagarajan
  7. D. McCloskey
  8. Kiran Raosaheb Patil

Citations in the corpus