Introduction to the Special Section: More Than Measurement Error: Discovering Meaning Behind Informant Discrepancies in Clinical Assessments of Children and Adolescents

By A. De Los Reyes. 2011

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de9bc0423b4f8a089b4d416a68dab3494a105014

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. Ribeaud
2. A. Murray
3. Manuel Eisner

In Education

1. Manuel Eisner

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. D. Ribeaud
2. A. Murray
3. Manuel Eisner
4. N. Eisner
5. Gilles E. Gignac

Citations in the corpus

• A practical guide to the analysis of non-response and attrition in longitudinal research using a real data example (2018, background): “Although it is common for different raters to disagree on child behavior (e.g., De Los Reyes, 2011), that these two raters suggested completely contradictory results is striking.”
• The Validity of the Multi-Informant Approach to Assessing Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2015, unknown): “Since the Achenbach et al. (1987) review, researchers have expanded the range of domains examined for cross-informant correspondence (e.g., anxiety, conduct problems, hyperactivity, mood; De Los Reyes, 2011).”