Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media

By Alice E. Marwick, D. boyd. 2014

916 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Privacy & Security, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

In Privacy & Security

In Social Sciences & Humanities

Citations in the corpus

MERLOT RESERVE: Neural Script Knowledge through Vision and Language and Sound (2022, methodology): “We took inspiration from Marwick and Boyd [82]’s framework of networked privacy, which posits that users posting public videos might encode private information – enough so that their intended viewership (friends, possibly) can catch the gist, but not enough so as to leak private details like phone n”
MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Models (2021, background): “, purposefully seeking exposure), a distinction noted by Marwick and boyd [66].”
What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy? (2022, background): “Posts on social media can also sometimes be made public inadvertently [63, 93].”
Children’s understanding of personal data and privacy online – a systematic evidence mapping (2019, background): “Privacy online is shaped by four key affordances (or socially designed features) of the digital environment – persistence, replicability, scalability and searchability – and can result in what Marwick and boyd (2014) term context collision, uncertain audiences and context collapse.”
Ten simple rules for responsible big data research (2017, background): “Breaches of privacy are key means by which big data research can do harm, and it is important to recognize that privacy is contextual [11] and situational [12], not reducible to a simple Ten Simple Rules for Responsible Big Data Research”
Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat (2016, background): “For these reasons, persistent social media are more likely to lead to experiences of “context collapse,” in which users find it challenging to decide what information to disclose given their diverse online audiences (Marwick & boyd, 2014; Vitak, 2012).”
Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2020, background): “Scholarly definitions vary vastly, and privacy means different things to different people (Marwick & boyd, 2014).”
Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: mediated temporality, duration and affect (2017, background): “These structures disrupt traditional notions of public and private and online and offline and individual and group (boyd & Heer, 2006; Donath & boyd, 2004; Marwick & boyd, 2014).”
Making It “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use (2016, background): “Because of the quasi-public but controlled nature of Facebook (boyd, 2014; Livingstone, 2008; Marwick & boyd, 2014b), deciding when to go “Facebook official” with a partner can be a hotly contested issue (Papp, Danielewicz & Cayemberg 2012).”
“Teachers Act Like We’re Robots”: TikTok as a Window Into Youth Experiences of Online Learning During COVID-19 (2021, background): “…social media also brings up particular risks and challenges for youth, including “Teachers Act Like We’re Robots” 3 privacy issues (Hodkinson, 2017; Marwick & boyd, 2014), potentially adverse effects on self-esteem and individuality (Michikyan & Subrahmanyam, 2012; Way & Malvini Redden, 2017),…”