Modeling of high power automotive batteries by the use of an automated test system

By B. Schweighofer, K. Raab, G. Brasseur. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2003

318 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de6bcd2372c1ef1962e666e419354260efbd4ae8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Jussi Suomela
2. A. Hentunen
3. Teemu Lehmuspelto

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Jussi Suomela
2. A. Hentunen
3. Teemu Lehmuspelto

Citations in the corpus

• Time-Domain Parameter Extraction Method for Thévenin-Equivalent Circuit Battery Models (2014, methodology): “The main difference between the impedance-based and Thévenin-based modeling methods is that the parameters of impedance-based models are extracted based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements in frequency domain [7], while Thévenin-based models are parameterized typically by (CP) exp”
• A survey of mathematics-based equivalent-circuit and electrochemical battery models for hybrid and electric vehicle simulation (2014, unknown): “The Th´evenin models of [13, 23, 24, 26, 33] and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) models of [7, 8, 22, 37–39] are good examples of these.”