Noninvasive genetic analysis in birds: testing reliability of feather samples

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Importance of a pilot study for non-invasive genetic sampling: genotyping errors and population size estimation in red deer (2006, unknown): “Segelbacher (2002) Tetrao urogallus Plumes 10 0.77% (P) 0% (P)”
NONINVASIVE GENETIC SAMPLING TOOLS FOR WILDLIFE BIOLOGISTS: A REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACCURATE DATA COLLECTION (2005, unknown): “SEGELBACHER, G. 2002.”
A comparison of sample types varying in invasiveness for use in DNA sex determination in an endangered population of greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus uropihasianus) (2005, background): “Noninvasive sampling has increased in avian genetics over the last decade (Pearce et al. 1997; Segelbacher and Steinbrück 2001; Segelbacher 2002), but there has been no thorough comparison of the quality and quantity of DNA produced among sample types.”
An overlooked DNA source for non‐invasive genetic analysis in birds (2005, background): “Most previous studies using feather samples for genetic analyses, collected both invasively and noninvasively, reported that the DNA was extracted from the basal tip of the calamus (Morin et al. 1994, Mundy et al. 1997b, Srikwan and Woodruff 1998, Segelbacher 2002, Petersen et al. 2003).”