An overlooked DNA source for non‐invasive genetic analysis in birds

By M. Horváth, Begoña Martínez-Cruz, J. J. Negro, L. Kalmár, J. Godoy. 2005

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9158a484f0bb0af94e7869902e33d592a7ab9aa7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Mcewing
2. N. Dawnay
3. David J. Anderson
4. R. Ogden
5. T. Maness

In Genetics

1. R. Mcewing
2. N. Dawnay
3. David J. Anderson
4. R. Ogden
5. T. Maness

Citations in the corpus

• Predictors of Juvenile Survival in Birds (2013, background): “DNA in feather samples is present in much lower copy number than DNA from blood or other tissue samples, and DNA from feathers may also be somewhat degraded if it originated from cells that died as the feather matured (Leeton et al. 1993, Horvath et al. 2005).”
• Wildlife DNA forensics—bridging the gap between conservation genetics and law enforcement (2009, methodology): “…have developed techniques for recovering DNA from a remarkable array of sample types (e.g. snake venom, Pook & McEwing 2005; moulted feathers, Horvath et al. 2005; fish scales, Kumar et al. 2007; porcupine quills, Oliveira et al. 2007; historic eggs, Lee & Prys-Jones 2008), enabling genetic…”