Comparison of high temperature shape memory behaviour for ZrCu-based, Ti–Ni–Zr and Ti–Ni–Hf alloys

By G. Firstov, J. van Humbeeck, Y. Koval’. 2004

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de2f7a858aad375af3fc7bf4daec1e1da89a0382

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. J. van Humbeeck
2. G. Firstov
3. Y. Koval’
4. H. Karaca

In Materials Chemistry

1. J. van Humbeeck
2. G. Firstov
3. Y. Koval’
4. H. Karaca
5. S. Saghaian
6. E. Acar
7. H. Tobe

Citations in the corpus

• NiTiHf-based shape memory alloys (2014, background): “aerospace), while Zr is associated with high oxygen affinity.(2,9,13) Among the potential HTSMAs, due to its low cost, medium ductility and high work output NiTiHf seems to be the most encouraging HTSMA for a wide range of applications in the critical 100–300uC temperature range.”
• High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys Problems and Prospects (2006, methodology): “Precipitation of the second phase along the grain boundaries in TiNiHf and TiNiZr (e.g., Firstov et al., 2004b) results in the brittleness of these HTSMA.”
• Shape memory alloys, Part I: General properties and modeling of single crystals (2006, unknown): “63 (Firstov et al., 2004).”