Shape memory alloys, Part I: General properties and modeling of single crystals
By E. Patoor, Dimitris C. Lagoudas, P. B. Entchev, L. Catherine Brinson, Xiujie Gao. 2006
504 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98703f18b4fec8353bc3fd872570f281bcb3fbd5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- J. Arghavani
- R. Naghdabadi
- Saeed Sohrabpour
- Tarak Ben Zineb
- Cheikh Cissé
- Piyas Chowdhury
- H. Sehitoglu
- S. Padula
In Mechanical Engineering
- H. Jerry Qi
- Martin L. Dunn
- J. Arghavani
- R. Naghdabadi
- Qi Ge
- Ferdinando Auricchio
- S. Padula
- Abhimanyu Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- A review of constitutive models and modeling techniques for shape memory alloys (2016, methodology): “Models using the LennardeJones potential An alternative to EAM for the study of the atomistic austeniteemartensite systems is to use the LennardeJones (LJ) po- tential, which has a simpler expression given by F ¼ 1 2 X i X jsi fij rij : (12) In Equation (12), the interaction energy fij(rij) between ”
- A revisit to atomistic rationale for slip in shape memory alloys (2017, background): “adjacent planes are placed with an offset displacement as can be seen in the projected view along the [100] direction.”
- Two-way reversible shape memory effects in a free-standing polymer composite (2011, background): “There have been great efforts in modeling this behavior under both free and constrained recovery conditions (Castro et al 2010, Chen and Lagoudas 2008a, 2008b, Chen et al 2008, Lagoudas et al 2006, Liu et al 2006, Patoor et al 2006, Qi et al 2008, Tobushi et al 1996, Westbrook et al 2010).”
- Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: A review (2012, methodology): “The productivity of the second method is higher than the first [35,111,1].”
- A multi-axial, multimechanism based constitutive model for the comprehensive representation of the evolutionary response of SMAs under general thermomechanical loading conditions (2011, background): “(3) As a corollary to (1) above, the appropriate use of ‘‘h” functions will automatically bypass any need for such alternative ‘‘specialized” treatment (often with further complications) as the Lagrange multipliers (Lagoudas et al., 2006; Patoor et al., 2006; Siredey et al., 1999), ‘‘polyconvex” con”