Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State:

By M. Zürn. 2000

477 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework (2019, background): “If IOs lack legitimacy in society, this contributes to a democratic deficit in global governance (Dahl 1999; Zürn 2000; Held and Koenig-Archibugi 2005).”
Politicization compared: at national, European, and global levels (2019, background): “…in the EU and asked for the institutional prerequisites to allow for Europe-wide public debates and political competition on the EU level (e.g., Follesdal and Hix 2006; Habermas 2007, 2011; Hix 2008; Risse 2010; Zürn 2000), the permissive consensus was seen by most as part of the success of the EU.”
Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’ (2013, background): “…of deliberative interactions with the public and civil society, and how these may contribute to the construction of a sense of collective identity and/or the formation of a collective political will in a European “public sphere” (e.g. Zürn 2000; Habermas 2001; Steffek 2003; Lucarelli et al. 2011).”
Input and output legitimacy: synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey (2010, background): “However, not all scholars agree with the traditional notion of a contradiction between input and output legitimacy, and some even suggest that we should expect these two types of legitimacy to be mutually reinforcing (Eriksen and Fossum 2000; Verweij and Josling 2003; Zürn 2000).”