Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program

By Bronwyn H Hall, Albert N. Link, J. T. Scott. 2000

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddea3c7f11f578003e96973b80e619e220b8e452

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting (2011, methodology): “2 Citation lags Forward citations are by nature truncated, since earlier patents have more time to garner citations than later ones (Hall et al., 2001). Sampat et al. (2003) compare university and corporate patents in the United States and find that the resulting difference in citation counts is sen”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, result): “These observations hence are in accordance with those made by Veugelers and Cassiman (2005) and Hall et al. (2001) mentioned above, and those that suggest that university research enhances technological opportunities and the productivity of private R&D, as discussed in the previous section.”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, neutral): “Collaborative (or joint) research refers to formal collaborative arrangements aimed at cooperation on R&D projects (Hall et al., 2001).”
Industry Funding of University Research and Scientific Productivity (2011, neutral): “Patent forward citations have been proved to be a suitable measure for the quality, importance or significance of a patented invention and have been used in various studies (see e.g. Henderson et al. 1998a; Hall et al. 2001; Trajtenberg 2001 or Czarnitzki et al. 2008).”
Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany (2011, positive): “…Chapple et al. (2005), and Carlsson and Fridh (2002) or Swamidass and Vulasa (2009), since many collaborations fail primarily because of differences in modes of operation, culture, lack of trust, and improper project management (Hall et al. 2001; Bruneel et al. 2010; Schartinger et al. 2001).”
Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model (2019, background): “There are also increasingly more research joint ventures among universities and industries for knowledge creation and exchange [42].”
Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration (2012, background): “Hall et al. (2001) point out that IP issues are major barriers to firms’ cooperation with universities.”
Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? (2008, background): “6 industry participants in a project funded by the Advanced Technology Program, Hall et al. (2001) show that about 30 percent of the firms had a university as a research partner and approximately the same proportion reported that IP issues are the important obstacle to university collaboration. Pavi”
Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments (2014, background): “There is a long and well-documented history of U-I research relationships in Europe and the USA (Hall, Link, and Scott 2001).”