Indicators of ecological change: comparison of the early response of four organism groups to stress gradients
By Richard K. Johnson, D. Hering, M. Furse, P. Verdonschot. Hydrobiologia, 2006
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dde7babdc939ac57293490339e2da67c426b9294
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- D. Carlisle
- M. Potapova
- M. Meador
- James Falcone
- D. Hering
- Richard K. Johnson
- S. Schmutz
- Charles P. Hawkins
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- D. Carlisle
- M. Meador
- M. Potapova
- James Falcone
- D. Hering
- Richard K. Johnson
- S. Schmutz
- Charles P. Hawkins
Citations in the corpus
- Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrate, and diatom assemblages (2008, result): “Our results are consistent with several studies that show that most taxonomic groups are not concordant in their response to either natural or stress gradients (Paavola et al. 2003, 2006, Passey et al. 2004, Griffith et al. 2005, Johnson et al. 2006).”
- Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress (2006, background): “The relatively species-poor fish and macrophyte assemblages of small streams may limit the use of these two organism groups and hence benthic invertebrates should be considered for monitoring the effects of hydromorphological degradation at the reach scale (see also Johnson et al., 2006b).”