Assessment of european streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish : a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress

By D. Hering, Richard K. Johnson, Sandra Kramm, S. Schmutz, K. Szoszkiewicz, P. Verdonschot. 2006

587 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/612886b6c0b7d192537bb06e7cce9c79e022eb14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. N. Friberg
2. Philippe Usseglio-Polatera
3. J. B. Dybkjær
4. J. Ólafsson
5. G. Gíslason
6. T. Lauridsen
7. S. Larsen
8. G. Woodward

In Environmental Chemistry

1. T. Lauridsen
2. N. Friberg

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Friberg
2. Philippe Usseglio-Polatera
3. J. B. Dybkjær
4. J. Ólafsson
5. G. Gíslason
6. T. Lauridsen
7. Ralf B. Schäfer
8. S. Larsen

Citations in the corpus

• Relationships between structure and function in streams contrasting in temperature (2009, result): “Most bioassessments of streams have been based on structural attributes and mostly using macroinverte- brates (e.g. Hering et al., 2006; Mazor et al., 2006) while surprisingly few studies cover multiple taxa (but see Hering et al., 2006).”
• Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale (2014, background): “Therefore, fish indices are primarily regarded as indicators of habitat degradation and flow regulations, rather than as indicators of water pollution (37).”