Just Deserts: An Experimental Study of Distributive Justice Norms

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution Norms (2003, methodology): “As noted above, although we found that infor mation about merit had a statistically signifi cant effect on the equality-effi ciency preferences of women but not men (Scott et al. 2001), we anticipate that our design change may reveal the same effect for both genders.”
Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories (2003, background): “Scott et al. (2001) propose a theory based on four principles that form the union of the sets listed above, i.”
Inequality and Happiness: When Perceived Social Mobility and Economic Reality do not Match (2010, unknown): “…to political convictions: Left-wing parties place more weight on equity of outcomes (so-called ‘social justice’), while right-wing governments place more weight on efficiency and equality in opportunities, as voters’ definitions of fairness differ systematically across parties (Scott et al. 2001).”