Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The epistemics of student problems: Explaining mathematics in a multi-lingual class (2012, methodology): “This analysis adds to recent Conversation Analytical studies of how participants in interaction deal with issues of knowledge (e.g. Stivers et al., 2011a).”
Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction (2013, unknown): “Stivers, Mondada and Steensig (2011) also describe the epistemic domain that forms part of the broader moral order as encompassing “epistemic authority over knowledge and differential rights and responsibilities with respect to knowledge (p.3, emphasis added).”
Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom (2015, background): “It has been well established in recent CA studies on the epistemics of everyday interaction that the management of rights and responsibilities regarding knowledge is key to understanding issues of cooperation, affiliation and sociality in human interaction (Stivers et al. 2011a; Heritage 2012a,b).”
Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits (2013, background): “…analysis has demonstrated that these features are actually oriented to by the participants with considerable effect not only on the structure of their utterances, but more generally on the way in which they build turns, actions and sequences (see Heritage, 2012a, 2012b; Stivers et al., 2011a).”