Economic growth and environmental quality: a meta-analysis of environmental Kuznets curve studies
By Hui Li, R. Berrens, Therese Grijalva. 2007
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dddd1c912d29413acc8e20629a00d92049344c73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- H. Haberl
- Dominik Wiedenhofer
- F. Krausmann
- Doris Virág
- G. Kalt
- Daniel Hausknost
- Andreas Mayer
- Felix Creutzig
Citations in the corpus
- A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan (2006, unknown): “For a meta analysis, see [65].”
- A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights (2020, background): “A few studies find absolute decoupling (Azam and Khan 2016, Roinioti and Koroneos 2017, Chen et al 2018, Madaleno and Moutinho 2018), but these are usually relatively small, short-term reductions of CO2 emissions (Li et al 2007).”
- Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature (2013, methodology): “Cavlovic et al. (2000) performed a meta-analysis of 25 studies 121 observations - with a focus on turning points. They cover 11 categories of environmental goods, such as urban air quality, including deforestation. Observations for deforestation represent only 6 % of their sample. The impact of defo”
- An empirical analysis of the determinants of CO2 emissions in GCC countries (2020, methodology): “Li et al. (2007) conduct a meta-analysis covering 77 studies published between 1992 and 2005 and examining the validity of the EKC hypothesis.”
- Global biodiversity decline of marine and freshwater fish: A cross-national analysis of economic, demographic, and ecological influences (2008, background): “…research are mixed, but the EKC is typically found only for a few local environmental impacts, such as air and water pollution, but not for sources of global environmental problems, such as greenhouse gas emissions and resource consumption (Cavlovic et al., 2000; Dinda, 2004; York et al., 2003a,b).”
- Taking the "U" out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. (2009, background): “…(Dasgupta et al., 2002); pointing out that the results are often sensitive to the nations (or states) chosen, the pollutant measurement (emissions versus ambient concentrations), trade effects, functional form, and methodological choice (Harbaugh et al., 2002; also see Cavlovic et al., 2000).”