Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion

By M. Williamson. Biological Invasions, 2006

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ddaf6f86ba17fa1db7b3c6d61248926127c63b6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Feral cat diet and impact on sooty terns at Juan de Nova Island, Mozambique Channel (2008, background): “It has been highlighted that both acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) characteristics of invasive mammal predation need to be understood for effective management practices (Strayer et al., 2006; Williamson, 2006).”
The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits (2009, background): “By analysing two separate stages of the invasion process (Richardson et al., 2000; Williamson, 2006), we show that the relative importance of native-range distributional characteristics and biological traits is stage-dependent and that the latter is more important in later, more advanced stages of i”
Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. (2008, background): “Initial stages of the invasion process such as import, release and escape are mainly influenced by socioeconomic factors, whereas later on, biogeographical, ecological and evolutionary factors gain a more important role (Williamson, 2006).”
Ability of European parasitoids (Hymenoptera) to control a new invasive Asiatic pest, Drosophila suzukii (2012, background): “Three phases are typically distinguished between the introduction of species and the stage of biological invasion (Sakai et al., 2001; Williamson, 2006): (1) the”
MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions (2020, background): “2013); socioeconomic factors are suggested to be generally important early in the invasion process, whereas biogeography, ecology, and evolution play more important roles at later stages (Williamson 2006; McGeoch et al. 2016).”
Emerging diseases in European forest ecosystems and responses in society. (2011, background): “In addition, the small proportion of cases in which a species becomes invasive poses a fundamental problem when making predictions [23].”
Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia (2010, background): “Species progress through these stages by overcoming a series of abiotic and biotic barriers, and the suitability of the climate in the introduced range is cited as one of the main abiotic barriers to the establishment of exotic plants (Williamson 2006;Hayes &Barry 2008).”
Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what? (2010, methodology): “Indeed, given the low rates of establishment and expansion recorded for introduced individuals (Williamson 2006), there is no guarantee that the individuals intercepted would have spearheaded a successful invasion. tures of these inference methods based on tree topologies, highlighting their…”
Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? (2009, background): “For invasion mainly ecological and evolutionary factors need to be considered (Williamson, 2006).”
Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds (2008, background): “I attempted to capture this in the tens rule’ (Williamson, 2006; p. 1562).”
A paradox of trout invasions in North America (2008, background): “In addition, several authors have proposed that invasions are often idiosyncratic so that prediction will require testing theory and developing models that consider such interactions for specific taxa like these salmonids (Lodge 1993; Moyle and Light 1996a, b; Simberloff et al. 2005; Williamson 2006”
Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion (2009, methodology): “Instead, minimum adequate models were refitted to corresponding species data sets, and we calculated sensitivity and specificity of model predictions (Altman & Bland 1994), with a cut-off probability of 0.5 demarcating predicted species success from predicted failure (Williamson 2006).”
The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “…and the role of species traits is context dependent and differs with respect to ecological settings and stage of an invasion (Hamilton et al., 2005; Williamson, 2006; Pyšek and Richardson, 2007; Van Kleunen et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2007; Gravuer et al., 2008; Küster et al., 2008; Pyšek et…”
The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate (2009, background): “Making a prediction under such novel conditions is not only prone to error (Heikkinen et al. 2006; Williamson 2006) it is also ecologically and statistically invalid.”
Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. (2010, methodology): “…of addressing different stages of invasion in such analyses was illustrated in a previous paper based on the same species set as the one analysed here (Kubešová et al. 2010), since the traits correlated with invasion success may differ between stages (Williamson 2006, Pyšek et al. 2009a, b).”
Five Potential Consequences of Climate Change for Invasive Species (2008, background): “A species must pass through a variety of environmental filters to become invasive (e.g., Vermeij 1996; Williamson 2006; Williamson & Fitter 1996; Theoharides & Dukes 2007; Fig.”