Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds

By Jonathan M. Jeschke. 2008

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1de533363a11e484d6764fb96288c7e829f2d75c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Petr Pyšek
2. Jonathan M. Jeschke
3. P. Hulme
4. Jan Pergl
5. M. Vilà
6. P. Genovesi
7. S. Bacher
8. Daniel Simberloff

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Petr Pyšek
2. P. Hulme
3. Jonathan M. Jeschke
4. D. Richardson
5. Jan Pergl
6. M. Vilà
7. I. Kühn
8. Daniel Simberloff

In Genetics

1. Daniel Simberloff
2. Petr Pyšek
3. B. Mckie
4. George Marbuah
5. Ing-Marie Gren
6. P. Hulme
7. David L. Strayer
8. Alain Roques

Citations in the corpus

• How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts? (2011, background): “By contrast, for vertebrates exchanged between Europe and North America, Jeschke and Strayer (2005) suggest that perhaps 25% become invasive, but their methods are likely to yield an overestimate (see Rodriguez-Cabal et al. 2009).”
• Economics of Harmful Invasive Species: A Review (2014, result): “This is further corroborated by [11] in a study of introduced mammals and birds.”
• Troubling travellers: are ecologically harmful alien species associated with particular introduction pathways? (2017, background): “That pathways do not significantly affect the probability of impact of vertebrates may be related to the generally high invasion success of this group (Jeschke and Strayer 2005, Jeschke 2008), as well as to a high percentage of species with impacts compared to plants and invertebrates (Table 2).”
• General hypotheses in invasion ecology (2014, background): “Yet, empirical support for the rule is particularly low for vertebrates which often show much higher transition rates than predicted by the tens rule: they are typically around 50% rather than 10%, although the data are highly variable (Jeschke & Strayer, 2005; Jeschke, 2008).”
• Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy (2011, background): “For example, recent studies show that for many animal taxa, the percentage of introduced species that become established and the percentage of established species that become invasive can exceed 50% [5,21].”
• The Role of Propagule Pressure in Biological Invasions (2009, unknown): “Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press Jeschke JM. 2008.”
• Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining (2012, background): “…wild (they are called introduced species or casuals); about 10% of these introduced species will be able to establish themselves in the wild; and about 10% of species established will become invasive/pest species (Williamson and Brown 1986; Williamson 1996; Jeschke and Strayer 2005; Jeschke 2008).”