Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling

By E. Swyngedouw. 2004

961 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dda89599082d8446be3e309128983106e4677077

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development (2010, background): “‘Empowerment’ processes are thus linked to the acquisition of strategies of scale and capacities to mobilize scales and different levels (Swyngedouw 2004).”
Unfolding Webs: The Dynamics of Regional Rural Development (2008, background): “This phenomenon is sometimes called ^localization, and refers to the twin process through which institutional arrangements a) shift upwards from the national scale to supra-national or global scales and downwards to regional or local scales and b) where economic activities and inter-firm networks ar”
The Environmentalism of the Poor revisited: : Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles (2014, background): “” Resistance includes the “weapons of theweak”, ranging fromdialogue to direct confrontation and from local to international involvement in a “glocal” pattern (Swyngedouw, 2004).”
Crisis, Value, and Hope: Rethinking the Economy (2014, background): “The best we can probably do is to observe analytically how various scales are defined and how they articulate in practice (Swyngedouw 2004).”
The political ecology of Chilean salmon aquaculture, 1982–2010: A trajectory from economic development to global sustainability (2010, background): “role of glocalisation processes, or the continuous transformations in scalar configurations due to competing governance regimes, which Swyngedouw (2004) terms scales of regulation and scales of networks.”
The complexity of innovation: A relational turn (2011, background): “The result is a form of recasting of socio-economic processes both ‘upwards’ and ‘downwards’ in a scale that enables the development of new dominant modes of organizing and new dominant spatial patterns of relations (Jakobsen et al., 2009; Swyngedouw, 2004).”
Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis (2014, background): “…previously proved valuable in uncovering the linguistic relationships embedded in numerous energy policy analyses; for example in relation to nuclear power, coal, onshore wind and solar energy (Bern and Winkel, 2013; Hunold and Leitner, 2011; Jessup, 2010; Mander, 2008; Szarka, 2004; Usher, 2013).”
The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade (2012, background): “Re-allocation of water (rights) to gain ‘productive efficiency’ may imply that some groups win and others lose access to water, in particular the more vulnerable users (e.g., Swyngedouw, 2004; Castro, 2006; Achterhuis et al., 2010).”
Culture, worldview and transformative philosophy of mathematics education in Nepal: a cultural-philosophical inquiry (2009, background): “In my mind, glocalisation is an approach to rescuing inclusive view of globalisation from the longstanding Western orthodoxy that often uses an exclusive lens to insert strategically its worldview in the name of universalisation (Swyngedouw, 2004).”