Reflections on the social and psychological processes of legitimization and delegitimization

By H. Kelman. 2001

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd8ccaa3ca1f121a8028e83114585d0f1161b4a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Tom Tyler
2. G. Herek
3. B. Bradford
4. Christopher J. Lyons
5. J. Jackson
6. David de Cremer
7. Michael D. Reisig
8. Jacinta M. Gau

Citations in the corpus

• Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. (2006, background): “The potential risks of legitimacy are treated at length by Kelman & Hamilton (1989) and by Kelman (2001).”
• Confronting Sexual Stigma and Prejudice: Theory and Practice (2007, background): “In other words, heterosexism’s legitimacy in the United States and elsewhere is increasingly contested (e.g., Kelman, 2001).”
• Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future (2013, unknown): “At the same time, perceptions of legitimacy are essential to processes of persuasion and social influence, cooperation with authorities, political movements, and so on (e.g., Kelman, 2001; Raven & French, 1958; Tyler, 2006).”