The Rise and Fall of False Recall: The Impact of Presentation Duration☆

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The roles of spreading activation and retrieval mode in producing false recognition in the DRM paradigm (2007, background): “These studies and others (e.g., McDermott & Watson, 2001) have been viewed as providing converging evidence that, in addition to activation processes, monitoring processes are an important part of memory decisions on the DRM task.”
Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis (2001, methodology): “Similarly, when some lists are presented auditorily and others are presented visually, subjects attribute the illusory item as having occurred in the modality in which the list had been presented to the same extent as they make attributions for list items (Gallo, McDermott, Percer, & Roediger, 2001)”
Age Differences in Depth of Retrieval: Memory for Foils. (2005, methodology): “The semantic study sets were constructed by selecting 136 words from the materials used by McDermott and Watson (2001).”
Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: evidence for associative activation and monitoring (2002, background): “In brief, slowing the presentation rate of words beyond one second tends to decrease false recall (McDermott & Watson, 2001; Toglia & Neuschatz, 1996), but has little or no effect on false recognition (Arndt & Hirshman, 1998).”