Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis

829 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An associative-activation theory of children’s and adults’ memory illusions (2009, methodology): “DRM lists were also selected on the basis of mean BAS and FAS as indicated in the Roediger et al., 2001b norms.”
A visual analytics approach to understanding cycling behaviour (2012, neutral): “BCP and RSD could not, however, share the exact same training folds, as a result of the way in which the RSD tool was implemented (the RSD tool generates features before the folds are created, while CILP++ creates the folds in the ﬁrst place).”
Variability among word lists in eliciting memory illusions: evidence for associative activation and monitoring (2002, background): “These norms were part of a larger norming project consisting of at least 86 observations per item (see Roediger et al. 2001c, for details).”
Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks (2003, methodology): “For example, using a word generation task, Rubin and Wallace (1989) found that participants who were given meaningful cues such as ‘‘a mythical being’’ did not produce ghost; similarly, those who were given the cue ‘‘rhymes with ost’’ failed to produce ghost.”