The motivated construction of political judgments.
By Charles Taber, Milton Lodge, Jill Glathar. 2001
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd75d7c88a42372a1459924f9b1c087b5c83416c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- James N. Druckman
- Simona Kucsova
- Damon M. Cann
- Charles Taber
- Thomas Rudolph
- Thomas J. Leeper
- Yanna Krupnikov
- Christian Leuz
Citations in the corpus
- The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion (2009, background): “In introducing the theory of motivated reasoning to political science, Lodge and Taber (2000) explicitly build on the on-line (OL) processing theme, with affect serving as the bridge (also see Redlawsk 2001; Taber et al. 2001).”
- The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments (2009, background): “In our theory (Lodge and Taber 2000, 2005; Taber and Lodge 2006; Taber et al. 2001), motivated biases are triggered by affective reactions to the evidence or arguments under consideration.”
- Triangulating Political Responsibility: The Motivated Formation of Responsibility Judgments (2006, background): “In an effort to harmonize these two theoretical positions, social and political psychologists have recently advanced a broader theory of motivated reasoning in which the effects of motivation on reasoning are mediated by cognitive processes (Baumeister & Newman, 1994; Kunda, 1990; Lodge & Taber, 200”