Comparing least cost scenarios for 100% renewable electricity with low emission fossil fuel scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Residential solar PV policy: An analysis of impacts, successes and failures in the Australian case (2016, background): “This trend is likely to continue; under the RET, it is likely that Australia will be able to source a quarter of its electricity needs from renewable sources, mainly from wind and existing hydro-electricity resources by 2020 (Elliston et al, 2014).”
Is a 100% renewable European power system feasible by 2050? (2019, background): “For one reason or another, a number of studies have excluded nuclear and CCS technologies and investigated whether national power systems could rely on 100% RES, such as those for Denmark [6,7], The Netherlands [8], Germany [9,10], France [11,12], Ireland [13], Portugal [14], Israel [15], Japan [16]”
Impacts of Green New Deal Energy Plans on Grid Stability, Costs, Jobs, Health, and Climate in 143 Countries (2019, background): “hydrogen loads; and (13) scheduled and unscheduled maintenance down-”
Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems (2019, background): “In some studies, authors argue that it will be extremely costly (and technically infeasible) to perform this 100% RE transition [75,207,208], while other researchers find that it is both technically and economically feasible [143,145,150,224,227].”
Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions (2014, unknown): “[24, 25].”