Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain: 1. Theory and computation

By R. Denlinger, Richard M. Iverson. 2004

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd2578f09c1583ae85bbe57b47d431000cb3be89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Ecology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Grain-size segregation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows (2012, background): “[21] Transverse and vertical shear rates were similar in the leveed channel (both of order 20 s (1)), indicating that horizontal stresses – commonly neglected in depth-integrated flow models – play an important role in the dynamics of levee-channeled debris flows [Denlinger and Iverson, 2004].”
Granular and particle-laden flows: from laboratory experiments to field observations (2017, methodology): “The first order asymptotic development leads essentially to a hydrostatic pressure (including centrifugal forces) even though attempts have been made to include the vertical acceleration (Denlinger and Iverson 2004).”
Numerical modeling of 2‐D granular step collapse on erodible and nonerodible surface (2009, methodology): “[3] Numerical simulations of natural mass flows over complex terrains are currently used and developed to assess hazard and risk in exposed areas [Iverson and Denlinger, 2001; Denlinger and Iverson, 2001, 2004; Mangeney et al., 2000; Mangeney-Castelnau et al., 2005; Hungr, 1995; Chen and Lee, 2000”
Modelling debris flows down general channels (2005, methodology): “For alternative numerical schemes also see Denlinger and Iverson (2001, 2004), Koschdon and Scḧafer (2003), Iverson et al. (2004), Patra et al. (2005) and Vollmöller (2004).”
Granular avalanches across irregular three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Experimental tests (2004, methodology): “The evolving transition between static and dynamic states in the sand upslope of the head gate served to severely test our model predictions because our theory and numerical methods were optimized for computing avalanche dynamics, not static stresses in stationary sand [ Denlinger and Iverson, 2004 ”
On the use of Saint Venant equations to simulate the spreading of a granular mass (2005, background): “…inclined planes and geological flows along real topographies [e.g., Denlinger and Iverson, 2001; Naaim et al., 1997; Pastor et al., 2002; Pouliquen and Forterre, 2002; Mangeney- Castelnau et al., 2003; Pitman et al., 2003; Denlinger and Iverson, 2004; Iverson et al., 2004, Sheridan et al., 2005].”
Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods* (2011, methodology): “We are currently extending GeoClaw to handle debris flows using a variant of the models of Denlinger and Iverson (2004a, 2004b).”