Granular avalanches across irregular three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Experimental tests

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods* (2011, methodology): “We are currently extending GeoClaw to handle debris flows using a variant of the models of Denlinger and Iverson (2004a, 2004b).”
On the use of Saint Venant equations to simulate the spreading of a granular mass (2005, background): “…inclined planes and geological flows along real topographies [e.g., Denlinger and Iverson, 2001; Naaim et al., 1997; Pastor et al., 2002; Pouliquen and Forterre, 2002; Mangeney- Castelnau et al., 2003; Pitman et al., 2003; Denlinger and Iverson, 2004; Iverson et al., 2004, Sheridan et al., 2005].”
Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain: 1. Theory and computation (2004, methodology): “Smooth variation of these vectors and of the avalanche depth as well as excellent correspondence of the predicted and measured positions of the avalanche front [ Iverson et al., 2004 ] support the viability of our model.”
Modelling debris flows down general channels (2005, methodology): “…experiments have corroborated their validity for catastrophic land slide and avalanche events (see, e.g., Gray et al., 1999; Denlinger and Iverson, 2001; Pudasaini, 2003; 800 S. P. Pudasaini et al.: Modelling debris flows down general channels Iverson et al., 2004; and Pudasaini et al., 2005b).”