The Role of Moral Disengagement and Self-Efficacy in Cyberbullying

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Moral Disengagement About Cyberbullying and Parental Monitoring: Effects on Traditional Bullying and Victimization via Cyberbullying Involvement (2018, background): “The types of moral disengagement (vilifying victims through attribution of blame, reconstruing the conduct/moral justification, obscuring personal causal agency, and misrepresenting the consequences of one’s actions; Bussey et al., 2015) were included in the moral disengagement construct.”
A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach (2017, background): “Specifically, extant empirical studies on cyberbullying have documented that moral disengagement (Bussey et al., 2015; Perren and Sticca, 2011), narcissism (Braithwaite et al., 2009), depression (Kowalski et al., 2008), and self-efficacy (Bussey et al., 2015”