Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects.

By Alaaldin M. Alkilany, Pratik K Nagaria, C. Hexel, T. Shaw, C. Murphy, M. D. Wyatt. Small, 2009

1,011 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dd06f732169eda534781ed82b0dd017a36ec62ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. Younan Xia
2. Seeram Ramakrishna
3. Hui Wu
4. Ce Wang
5. Wei Pan
6. W. Teo
7. D. Lin
8. Heping Li

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Qiang Zhang
2. R. Bai
3. Xiaochun Wu
4. Yang Qiu
5. Yuliang Zhao
6. Yinglu Ji
7. Younan Xia
8. Liming Wang

In Materials Chemistry

1. Qiang Zhang
2. R. Bai
3. Xiaochun Wu
4. Yang Qiu
5. Yuliang Zhao
6. Yinglu Ji
7. Younan Xia
8. Liming Wang

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles (2011, background): “These surfaces could change following exposure to a culture medium as a result of physical andsor chemical adsorption of biomacromolecules such as serum protein”
• Optimized metal-organic-framework nanospheres for drug delivery: evaluation of small-molecule encapsulation. (2014, result): “There was no significant difference in EC50 values (Figure 5B), thereby confirming thatmost of theunboundCTABwas removed during thewashing steps and the surface adsorbed CTAB did not increase the cytotoxicity of our spheres.(56)”
• Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? (2010, neutral): “CTAB alone is a quite toxic to cells at submicromolar dose (Alkilany et al. 2009).”