Ego identity status research in the new millennium

By J. Kroger. 2000

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcf0dc00b4ca028c2183c5b73ba516928986134f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. K. Luyckx
2. Luc Goossens
3. Seth J. Schwartz
4. Byron L. Zamboanga
5. Bart Soenens
6. Robert S. Weisskirch
7. Susan M. Moore
8. Dennis Mazalin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Luyckx
2. Seth J. Schwartz
3. Luc Goossens
4. Byron L. Zamboanga
5. Bart Soenens
6. Robert S. Weisskirch
7. Susan M. Moore
8. Dennis Mazalin

Citations in the corpus

• Internet Use, Identity Development and Social Anxiety Among Young Adults (2004, background): “Marcia operationalised the study of ego identity by introducing the possibility of qualitatively different styles (identity statuses) of adolescents’ engagement in identity formation (Kroger, 2000).”
• Broadening the Study of the Self: Integrating the Study of Personal Identity and Cultural Identity (2008, background): “The identity status model, which has dominated the neoEriksonian personal identity literature (Kroger, 2000), provides important information on personal identity development.”
• The personality‐identity interplay in emerging adult women: convergent findings from complementary analyses (2006, background): “…identity and positively to exploration of alternatives (Clancy & Dollinger, 1993; Dollinger, Leong, & Ulicni, 1996; Dollinger & Orf, 1991; Kroger, 2000; Tesch & Cameron, 1987; Whitbourne, 1986) and an information-oriented identity style (e.g. Dollinger, 1995; Duriez, Soenens, & Beyers,…”