The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody

By Sun-Ah Jun. 2018

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A linguistic dissertation presenting experiment results focused on Korean speech rhythms and how they differ from those in English. The volume describes differences in the role of intonationally defined prosodic grouping influencing the pronunciation of consonants and vowels, the results of researc

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dce6ec9ec714d8ac20f592add8221357dc7fb430

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean (2001, methodology): “In this work, we use the model of Korean prosodic structure of Jun (1993) and”
Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives (2008, background): “Restricting ourselves to prosodic distinctions, speakers can use different pitch accents [3], [4], vary the distribution of (prenuclear and nuclear) pitch accents [3], or use different phrasings [5].”
The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening (2003, background): “This has been shown for gestures spanning a boundary in Byrd et al. (2000), for gestures initial in a phrasal domain by Hardcastle (1985), Jun (1993), and Keating, Cho, Fougeron, and Hsu (1999), for gestures early in a phrasal domain by McClean (1973), and for gestures final in a domain (for at…”
Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing (2008, unknown): “Such repetition has been noted for a variety of languages, including German, Bengali, Japanese, Spanish, Italian, Korean, French, and English (e.g., Beckman & Pierrehumbert, 1986; D’Imperio, 2000; Grice, 1995; Hayes & Lahiri, 1991; Jun, 1993; Prieto, van Santen, & Hirschberg, 1995; Welby, 2003).”
A Phonological Model of French Intonation (2000, background): “The final rise (LH) of AP has a demarcative function, similar to the AP in Korean (Jun, 1993, 1998).”
Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review (2010, background): “Cho (2002), Fougeron and Keating (1997), Jun (1993), Keating, Cho, Fougeron, and Hsu (2003) and Lavoie (2001) show that the phonetic realisation of segments depends on the strength of a preceding boundary.”
Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives (2002, unknown): “While these stops are all voiceless phrase-initially (or word-initially in isolation), the lenis stop is voiced intervocalically in word-medial or phrase-medial positions (Cho, 1990; Jun, 1993, 1995), in a phenomenon known as Intervocalic Lenis Stop Voicing.”
The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure: A probabilistic perspective (2010, background): “Languages such as Japanese and Korean do not seem to have pitch accents; they mark information structure using prosodic phrasing, and 'dephrasing' (”
The prosodic structure and pitch accent of Northern Kyungsang Korean (2006, methodology): “Interestingly, it adopts a completely different system for the use of pitch from Seoul Korean, the standard language in Korea.”
A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production (2002, background): “In this spirit, Jun (1993) showed that the number of syllables influences the location of Accentual Phrase boundaries in Korean.”