THE MISSING LINK IN GENERAL DETERRENCE RESEARCH

By G. Kleck, Brion Sever, S. Li, Marc G. Gertz. 2005

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century (2013, background): “Kleck et al. (2005), for example, survey adults residing in 54 large urban counties.”
TESTING A BAYESIAN LEARNING THEORY OF DETERRENCE AMONG SERIOUS JUVENILE OFFENDERS (2011, methodology): “For instance Kleck et al. (2005) analyzed individual perceptions of punishment and actual punishment levels in 54 urban counties using hierarchical linear modeling and found there to be no association between the two.”
Attention Felons: Evaluating Project Safe Neighborhood in Chicago (2007, unknown): “…of punishment.14 Forums also are relevant to deterrence in that they make salient to the targeted group information regarding the increased number of federal prosecutions and lengthy federal sentences, or what some have considered to be the “missing link” in deterrence research (Kleck et al. 2005).”
Peer Influence and Delinquency (2019, background): “Just as Nagin (2013) said there is a need to understand why there is a disjoint between objective sanction risk and perceived risk (e.g., Kleck et al. 2005), there is also a need to understand the conditions under which objective and perceived peer deviance diverge.”
Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature (2017, background): “Important recent work includes that of Kleck et al. (2005) and Kleck and Barnes (2013), who conducted a telephone survey of 1,500 adults in fifty-four large urban counties in the United States.”