One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources management decentralisation in Cameroon
By P. R. Oyono. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 2004
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Theory informs us that decentralisation, a process through which powers, responsibilities and resources are devolved by the central state to lower territorial entities and regionally/locally elected bodies, increases efficiency, participation, equity, and environmental sustainability. Many types and forms of decentralisation have been implemented in Africa since the colonial period, with varying degrees of success. This paper explores the process of forest management decentralisation conducted in Cameroon since the mid-1990s, highlighting its foundations and characterising its initial assets. Through the transfer of powers to peripheral actors for the management of forestry fees, Council Forests and Community [or Village] Forests, this policy innovation could be empowering and productive. However, careful observation and analysis of relationships between the central state and regional/local-level decentralised bodies, on the one hand, and of the circulation of powers, on the other, show – after a decade of implementation – that the experiment is increasingly governed by strong tendencies towards ‘re-centralisation’, dictated by the practices of bureaucrats and state representatives. The paper also confirms recent empirical studies of ‘the capture of decentralised actors’. It finally shows how bureaucrats and state authorities are haunted by the Frankenstein's monster syndrome, concerning state–local relationships in decentralised forest management.
Subfields: Development, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dce0fbde688a7f7880b84bbd98a83beaa644e89f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- New Rights for Forest-Based Communities? Understanding Processes of Forest Tenure Reform (2010, background): “…have included case studies of social or community forestry (Bray et al. 2005, Colfer 2005a,b, Gibson et al. 2000, Klooster 1999, 2000, Menzies 2007, Oyono 2004, 2005, Peluso 1992, Poffenberger 1990, 1996), decentralization and devolution (Agrawal 2005, Agrawal and Ostrom 2008, Andersson 2006,…”
- Profiling Local-Level Outcomes of Environmental Decentralizations: The Case of Cameroon’s Forests in the Congo Basin (2005, background): “This superimposition of an organization on a society has already been analyzed in Cameroon (Djeumo, 2001; Oyono, 2004c) and elsewhere (Morrow & Watts Hull, 1996; Wang, 1997).”