Profiling Local-Level Outcomes of Environmental Decentralizations: The Case of Cameroon’s Forests in the Congo Basin

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Critical Comparison of Conventional, Certified, and Community Management of Tropical Forests for Timber in Terms of Environmental, Economic, and Social Variables (2017, background): “Whereas new CFM schemes can cause internal conflicts, they reportedly also lead to increased awareness, participation, and empowerment (Oyono 2005; Palmer & Engel 2007).”
Understanding decentralized forest governance: an application of the institutional analysis and development framework (2006, methodology): “One way of doing this would be to employ ecologicaloutcome variables as proxies for good resource governance (for efforts along these lines, see Agrawal & Ostrom, 2001; Oyono, 2005; Andersson & Gibson, in press).”
Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia (2007, background): “Finally, in his study of local villages in Cameroon’s tropical forest region, Oyono (2005) notes very mixed results in the environmental outcomes among the villages that were recently given increased formal governance responsibilities in the forestry sector.”