Quasar Feedback: The Missing Link in Structure Formation

By Evan Scannapieco, S. Oh. 2004

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We consider the impact of quasar outflows on structure formation. Such outflows are potentially more important than galactic winds, which appear insufficient to produce the level of preheating inferred from X-ray observations of galaxy clusters. At late times, energetic material from the densest objects in the centers of galaxies makes its way into the intergalactic medium (IGM), impacting structures on many scales, much as supernovae impact structures on many scales within the interstellar medium. Using a simple analytical model for the distribution of quasars with redshift, coupled with a one-dimensional Sedov-Taylor model for outflows, we are able to make robust statements about these interactions. As large regions of the IGM are heated above a critical entropy of Scrit ≈ 100 keV cm2, cooling becomes impossible within them, regardless of changes in density. On quasar scales, this has the effect of inhibiting further formation, resulting in their observed falloff in number densities below z ≈ 2. On galaxy scales, quasar feedback fixes the turnover scale in the galaxy luminosity function (L*) as the nonlinear scale at the redshift of strong feedback. The galaxy luminosity function then remains largely fixed after this epoch, consistent with recent observations and in contrast to the strong evolution predicted in more standard galaxy-formation models. Finally, strong quasar feedback explains why the intracluster medium is observed to have been preheated to entropy levels just above Scrit, the minimum excess that would not have been erased by cooling. The presence of such outflows is completely consistent with the observed properties of the Lyα forest at z ~ 2 but is expected to have a substantial and detectable impact on Compton distortions observed in the microwave background and the multiphase properties of the "warm-hot" (z = 0) circumgalactic medium.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcd73977249fc78aad1a422c35d66ed9d4dc599b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. Schneider
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Volker Springel
  7. Thomas J. Cox
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Thomas J. Cox
  4. R. Somerville
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. D. Schneider
  7. Volker Springel
  8. Brant Robertson

Citations in the corpus