Cold Molecular Outflows in the Local Universe and Their Feedback Effect on Galaxies

By A. Fluetsch, R. Maiolino, S. Carniani, A. Marconi, C. Cicone, M. Bourne, T. Costa, A. C. Fabian, W. Ishibashi, G. Venturi. Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study molecular outflows in a sample of 45 local galaxies, both star forming and AGN, primarily by using CO data from the ALMA archive and from the literature. For a subsample we also compare the molecular outflow with the ionized and neutral atomic phases. We infer an empirical analytical function relating the outflow rate simultaneously to the SFR, $L_{\rm AGN}$, and galaxy stellar mass; this relation is much tighter than the relations with the individual quantities. The outflow kinetic power shows a larger scatter than in previous, more biased studies, spanning from 0.1 to 5 per cent of $L_{\rm AGN}$, while the momentum rate ranges from 1 to 30 times $L_{\rm AGN}/c$, indicating that these outflows can be both energy-driven, but with a broad range of coupling efficiencies with the ISM, and radiation pressure-driven. For about 10 per cent of the objects the outflow energetics significantly exceed the maximum theoretical values; we interpret these as 'fossil outflows' resulting from activity of a past strong AGN, which has now faded. We estimate that, in the stellar mass range probed here ($>$ 10$^{10}~\rm M_{\odot}$), less than 5 per cent of the outflowing gas escapes the galaxy. The molecular gas depletion time associated with the outflow can be as short as a few million years in powerful AGN, however, the total gas (H$_2$+HI) depletion times are much longer. Altogether, our findings suggest that even AGN-driven outflows might be relatively ineffective in clearing galaxies of their entire gas content, although they are likely capable of clearing and quenching the central region.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ead40043170445c29f7bceb0842fd563d673e34

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. M. Vogelsberger
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Shy Genel
  5. P. Torrey
  6. D. Nelson
  7. F. Marinacci
  8. A. Pillepich

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. M. Vogelsberger
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Shy Genel
  5. D. Nelson
  6. P. Torrey
  7. F. Marinacci
  8. A. Pillepich

Citations in the corpus